Mental health facilities, residential · Illinois

Clayton Residential Home

Chicago, IL · ~112 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clayton Residential Home runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mental health facilities, residential workplace, earning a grade C.

Clayton Residential Home: 3.1 TCR = 83% of Mental health facilities, residential BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clayton Residential Home safety composite

Clayton Residential Home scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2024

Clayton Residential Home injury rate improved

Clayton Residential Home's TCR fell 2.7 from 5.0 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 83% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #18/45
  • PHOTO St. Bernards Behavor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Bernards Behavorial Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Clayton Residential Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clayton Residential Home averages 3.1 TCR (83% of the Mental health facilities, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clayton Residential Home TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Clayton Residential Home falls in its industry

1,165 Mental health facilities, resi establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 45 Mental health facilities, resi employers in Illinois.

Clayton Residential Home (112 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Clayton Residential Home
Clayton Residential Home (112 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Clayton Residential Home has more employees than the Mental health facilities, residential median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2020 3.7 2.8 4 0 0
2019 5.7 5.7 7 0 0
2018 3.9 3.1 5 0 0
2017 5.0 5.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · IL · Chicago

1,165 Mental health facilities, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Bernards Behavorial Health 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1507-MNTC-MPLS - GRACE MANOR 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1507 - Mpls Grace Manor 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perimeter Behavioral of Forrest City 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Home Forever Baths Company (DBA- Pacific Bath Chicago) 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lindblad Construction Company of Joliet, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE G. E. Riddiford Company, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE FE Moran Special Hazards 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Dixie Plywood & Lumber Co. of Nashville 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LaMettry's Collision - Inver Grove Heights 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0069 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Window Inc./AWI Installation Services Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goebel Construction Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE DFF 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behr Paint Company Standard 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.