Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Maryland

Largo Rail Division

Seat Pleasant, MD · ~119 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Largo Rail Division runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade D.

Largo Rail Division: 7.7 TCR = 171% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Largo Rail Division safety composite

Largo Rail Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2018→2022

Largo Rail Division injury rate improved

Largo Rail Division's TCR fell 3.3 from 11.9 in 2018 to 8.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.9 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Seat Pleasant, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.7 · 171% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #14/20
  • PHOTO Metro Transit Green …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metro Transit Green Line LRT OMF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Largo Rail Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Largo Rail Division averages 7.7 TCR (171% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Largo Rail Division TCR series: 2018=11.9 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=8.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Largo Rail Division falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Maryland.

Largo Rail Division (119 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Largo Rail Division
Largo Rail Division (119 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Largo Rail Division has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.6 7.8 9 2 0
2021 5.8 4.1 6 1 0
2020 5.8 5.8 4 3 0
2019 6.3 6.3 4 2 0
2018 11.9 7.1 7 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MD · Seat Pleasant

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 4 employers in Seat Pleasant, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metro Transit Green Line LRT OMF 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Romulus, MI - Harrison Road Bldg #11 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norwalk Transit District 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Circuit Transit Inc- WPB 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Medical Cannabis Grower 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baltimore Call Center 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strategic Factory 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Sheet Metal & Mechanical, LLC 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5800 LARGO RAIL OPERATIONS 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4186-07004 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Haverty Furniture Companies 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR South Bay Guidance Center 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Ridge of Hayes 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 332505-Fair Lawn Po 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Field Maintenance & Fabrication, LLC 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Penn - Corporate 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE NABCO Electric 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fay Block Materials 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.