Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Kansas

Lawrence Energy Center

Lawrence, KS · ~86 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lawrence Energy Center runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

Lawrence Energy Center: 0.9 TCR = 78% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lawrence Energy Center safety composite

Lawrence Energy Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lawrence Energy Center: 1.1 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Lawrence Energy Center's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.1 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Lawrence, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/10
  • PHOTO South Point Energy C…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Point Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Lawrence Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lawrence Energy Center averages 0.9 TCR (78% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lawrence Energy Center TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Lawrence Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 10 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Kansas.

Lawrence Energy Center (86 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lawrence Energy Center
Lawrence Energy Center (86 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Lawrence Energy Center has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · KS · Lawrence

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lawrence, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Point Energy Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES Indiana - Petersburg 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muskogee Power Plant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cane Run Station 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods Inc. Organic 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Johnson County Service Center 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Corporate Office 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kansas City (KS) Feed Plant 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant 807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amarr Entrematic 717 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 484 348 FTE
NAT-TCR UHM/Vanguard Center/HPC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SNL Distribution Services Corp-Chicago 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MK Electric & Design Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nucor Building Systems 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maplewood at Princeton 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE 726 Jefferson City 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE 231 St John 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Inn at Coalridge 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.