Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) · Wisconsin

L.E. Phillips CDC

Eau Claire, WI · ~232 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L.E. Phillips CDC runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) workplace, earning a grade D.

L.E. Phillips CDC: 5.1 TCR = 133% of Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L.E. Phillips CDC safety composite

L.E. Phillips CDC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2019→2024

L.E. Phillips CDC injury rate improved

L.E. Phillips CDC's TCR fell 7.1 from 9.9 in 2019 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.9 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Eau Claire, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/60
  • PHOTO Goodwill Industries …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~232 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodwill Industries of Central Iowa Corporate Headquarters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

L.E. Phillips CDC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L.E. Phillips CDC averages 5.1 TCR (133% of the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L.E. Phillips CDC TCR series: 2019=9.9 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where L.E. Phillips CDC falls in its industry

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 60 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor employers in Wisconsin.

L.E. Phillips CDC (232 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate L.E. Phillips CDC
L.E. Phillips CDC (232 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

L.E. Phillips CDC has more employees than the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experien median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 4 0 0
2023 3.5 1.4 5 0 0
2022 5.9 3.7 8 0 0
2021 4.9 0.7 7 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 4 0 0
2019 9.9 1.2 12 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · WI · Eau Claire

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 271 employers in Eau Claire, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Industries of Central Iowa Corporate Headquarters 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Road to Responsibility Inc 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Center 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Workshop of Armstrong County Inc 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes LLC - Beloit 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foodservice La Crosse - 0558 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10776 Madison Segoe 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3268 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precision Pipeline, LLC 3,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple) 3,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR WWD Sacred Heart Hospital 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR STORE DIVISION ADMIN - 3019 900 FTE
NAT-TCR Winchester 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Knolls CCRC Nursing Home 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clemmons Village I 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TXH072 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE SEDH 04 - Cypress Branch 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeffco Fibres, Inc. 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE MG Waldbaum (Farms) 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3M Austin Business Center 232 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.