Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Minnesota

Legacy Power Line

Wadena, MN · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legacy Power Line runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Legacy Power Line: 5.6 TCR = 199% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legacy Power Line safety composite

Legacy Power Line scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Legacy Power Line: 1.3 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Legacy Power Line's TCR rose 5.0 from 1.3 in 2018 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Wadena, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 199% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/38
  • PHOTO VC025 - VCI - Upland
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VC025 - VCI - Upland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Legacy Power Line in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legacy Power Line averages 5.6 TCR (199% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legacy Power Line TCR series: 2018=1.3 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Legacy Power Line falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 38 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Minnesota.

Legacy Power Line (43 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Legacy Power Line
Legacy Power Line (43 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Legacy Power Line has fewer employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 0.0 2 0 0
2023 7.1 3.6 2 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2020 5.7 3.8 2 1 0
2019 10.4 8.6 6 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MN · Wadena

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 34 employers in Wadena, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VC025 - VCI - Upland 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KLK Construction 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henkels & McCoy, Inc. - Lone Tree, CO 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4246 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4246 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elementary 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Homecrest Outdoor Living 100 FTE
NAT-TCR Garland Recycling 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Georgia Warehouse 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Early Childhood Center 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ShopRite of Wallington 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Digging & Rigging II, Inc. DBA Coastal Crane Service 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amita Health Saint Joseph Hospital Elgin 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tuckey Mechanical Services 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Glenmont Facility 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.