Cellular phone tower construction · New Hampshire

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH

Bow, NH · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cellular phone tower construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH: 5.6 TCR = 199% of Cellular phone tower construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH safety composite

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH: 0.0 → 14.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.63× in 2022

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH's TCR rose 14.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 14.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Bow, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 199% of ind

  • DART 14.7 DART
  • RANK #10/12
  • PHOTO Pike Telecom and Ren…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pike Telecom and Renewables Tennessee Statewide Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH averages 5.6 TCR (199% of the Cellular phone tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=14 · 2021=0 · 2022=14.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH falls in its industry

1,605 Cellular phone tower construct establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 12 Cellular phone tower construct employers in New Hampshire.

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH (26 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH
Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH (26 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Bow, NH has fewer employees than the Cellular phone tower construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.7 14.7 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 14.0 4.7 1 2 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NH · Bow

1,605 Cellular phone tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 40 employers in Bow, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pike Telecom and Renewables Tennessee Statewide Operations 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Utilicom, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Power Line 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HOT SPRINGS 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennichuck Water Works Inc - Treatment Plant 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE A.B. Excavating Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Park Construction Corp 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyline Roofing 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amoskeag Beverages, LLC 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR AmoskeagBeveragesLLC 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Specialty Forest Products 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR R.S. Audley, Inc. 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Miami Depot 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Grocers #144 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hugo Benzing LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1015 Tigard 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Engineered Plastics, LLC. East 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE JI 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waycross Operating - 2470 Wadley Road Waycross, GA 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burnsville PN Fairview Ridges 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.