Wood cutting saw blades manufacturing · Michigan

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan

Grand Rapids, MI · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Wood cutting saw blades manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan: 2.2 TCR = 65% of Wood cutting saw blades manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan safety composite

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan held a steady TCR band

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332216 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Specialty Fabricator…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Specialty Fabricators, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan averages 2.2 TCR (65% of the Wood cutting saw blades manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan falls in its industry

174 Wood cutting saw blades manufa establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Wood cutting saw blades manufa employers in Michigan.

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan (32 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan
Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan (32 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan has fewer employees than the Wood cutting saw blades manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2022 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2021 5.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332216 · MI · Grand Rapids

174 Wood cutting saw blades manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Specialty Fabricators, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robert Bosch Tool Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acme Industrial Co. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tekton, Inc 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6801_15743 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Soil Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berrybrook 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tawas 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Louis Dreyfus Company - Cahokia 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tennsco Plant 6 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pike Virginia Statewide Operations 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Group 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE K Johnson Construction, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alabama Timber Industries, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blaylock Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE DRM Industries Corp 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.