Lockers (except refrigerated) manufacturing · Tennessee

Tennsco Plant 6

Dickson, TN · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tennsco Plant 6 runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Lockers (except refrigerated) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Tennsco Plant 6: 2.2 TCR = 65% of Lockers (except refrigerated) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tennsco Plant 6 safety composite

Tennsco Plant 6 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tennsco Plant 6 held a steady TCR band

Tennsco Plant 6's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337215 · Dickson, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Boden Store Fixtures
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boden Store Fixtures (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Tennsco Plant 6 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tennsco Plant 6 averages 2.2 TCR (65% of the Lockers (except refrigerated) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tennsco Plant 6 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tennsco Plant 6 falls in its industry

231 Lockers (except refrigerated) establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Lockers (except refrigerated) employers in Tennessee.

Tennsco Plant 6 (28 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tennsco Plant 6
Tennsco Plant 6 (28 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Tennsco Plant 6 has fewer employees than the Lockers (except refrigerated) manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 2.5 2 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 5.9 2.9 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337215 · TN · Dickson

231 Lockers (except refrigerated) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 73 employers in Dickson, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boden Store Fixtures 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Lockers Bronze Way 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hallmark Center Fixture Operations 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Speedrack Products Group Ltd_Quincy 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE K&K Tobacco Farms LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tosh Pork Martin 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Livingston 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lashlee-Rich, Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dickson County Board of Education 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Horizon Medical Center 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR Express Employment Professonals 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dickson County Government 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Pike Virginia Statewide Operations 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Group 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Louis Dreyfus Company - Cahokia 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Leitz Tooling Systems LP - Michigan 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schulte Machine Works, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bradley Masonry, Nc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kay-Kay Realty Corp. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.