Housing construction, for-sale builder · Maryland

Lennar - Maryland

Columbia, MD · ~183 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lennar - Maryland runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing construction, for-sale builder workplace, earning a grade A.

Lennar - Maryland: 1.1 TCR = 30% of Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lennar - Maryland safety composite

Lennar - Maryland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lennar - Maryland held a steady TCR band

Lennar - Maryland's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.7 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Columbia, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO Highland Homes Houst…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Highland Homes Houston, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Lennar - Maryland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lennar - Maryland averages 1.1 TCR (30% of the Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lennar - Maryland TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Lennar - Maryland falls in its industry

341 Housing construction, for-sale establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Housing construction, for-sale employers in Maryland.

Lennar - Maryland (183 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lennar - Maryland
Lennar - Maryland (183 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lennar - Maryland has more employees than the Housing construction, for-sale builder median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.6 3 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2021 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2019 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · MD · Columbia

341 Housing construction, for-sale builder employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 179 employers in Columbia, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Highland Homes Houston, LLC. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SA2DIV-PH-MID CITIES DIVISION 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR K. Hovnanian Homes Southern CA Division 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar - Northern Alabama 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE TriMark Adams Burch 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 8193 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6434 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE MD - Baltimore, 8031 Corporate Dr 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howard County General Hospital 1,952 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate HQ 712 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuVasive Clinical Services Monitoring, Inc 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuVasive Clinical Services Monitoring Inc - Columbia 586 FTE
NAT-TCR Bullen companies 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hangar 10 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR White River Lodge 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Gulfport 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aquarius Water Conditioning, Inc 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Extrudex Aluminum, Inc 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clallam County Public Hospital District #1 (DBA Forks Community Hospital) 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klickitat Valley Health 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.