Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) · Georgia

Liberty Construction, Inc.

Brunswick, GA · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Liberty Construction, Inc. runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) workplace, earning a grade D.

Liberty Construction, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 120% of Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Liberty Construction, Inc. safety composite

Liberty Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Liberty Construction, Inc.: 7.4 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2024

Liberty Construction, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.9 from 7.4 in 2020 to 8.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Brunswick, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.1 · 120% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Wolf Waste LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wolf Waste LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Liberty Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Liberty Construction, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (120% of the Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Liberty Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2020=7.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Liberty Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

288 Dumps, nonhazardous solid wast establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Dumps, nonhazardous solid wast employers in Georgia.

Liberty Construction, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Liberty Construction, Inc.
Liberty Construction, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Liberty Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 4.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.4 7.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · GA · Brunswick

288 Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 113 employers in Brunswick, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wolf Waste LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR S10238 - Crossroads Eco Center LF 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rumpke Sanitary Landfill 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MID FLORIDA MATERIALS 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE FPL Food Chatel Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Pine Grove, LA 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Pride Athens Hatchery 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkins Logging & Timber Co LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Georgia Health System - Brunswick Campus 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brunswick 1,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Georgia Physician Associates 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA075 Brunswick Cellulose 547 FTE
NAT-TCR Elkhart Oaks Care Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Charleston County Aviation Authority (All Establishments) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR KR Acquisitions 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Annapolis Junction 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaGrou West Chicago 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1412 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1461 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Valley Electric Association, North Pole 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.