Rock crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Lippmann Milwaukee

Cudahy, WI · ~86 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lippmann Milwaukee runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rock crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Lippmann Milwaukee: 7.7 TCR = 233% of Rock crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lippmann Milwaukee safety composite

Lippmann Milwaukee scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2016→2024

Lippmann Milwaukee injury rate improved

Lippmann Milwaukee's TCR fell 9.4 from 11.8 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.8 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=16.5 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Cudahy, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 233% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/40
  • PHOTO Matcor Metal Fabrica…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Matcor Metal Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Lippmann Milwaukee in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lippmann Milwaukee averages 7.7 TCR (233% of the Rock crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lippmann Milwaukee TCR series: 2016=11.8 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=16.5 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Lippmann Milwaukee falls in its industry

400 Rock crushing machinery, porta establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 40 Rock crushing machinery, porta employers in Wisconsin.

Lippmann Milwaukee (86 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lippmann Milwaukee
Lippmann Milwaukee (86 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Lippmann Milwaukee has fewer employees than the Rock crushing machinery, portable, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 7.4 5.9 4 1 0
2022 16.5 14.2 12 2 0
2021 4.8 3.6 3 1 0
2020 6.3 5.3 5 1 0
2019 10.8 4.2 10 3 0
2018 7.7 5.1 4 2 0
2017 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2016 11.8 7.1 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · WI · Cudahy

400 Rock crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 51 employers in Cudahy, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Matcor Metal Fabrication 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR falcon 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tuckers 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zah Group, Inc. 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SPA:SP001 - SP001-Tjader-New Richmond, WI 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terminal-Andrae, LLC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE BelGioioso Cheese - Glenmore 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blair 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield - Cudahy Packaged 1,241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cudahy Packaged 1,131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Lukes South Shore 801 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATI Forged Products - Cudahy Operations 732 FTE
NAT-TCR PCSI Location 610 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 025-Del Norte 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Landry's Professional Lawn and Landscape, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastside 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lowes Foods #278 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-Ox Welding Supply Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversified Harvesting Comapany LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Livermore CA FXFE-LVM 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.