Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees · Washington

Living Well Health Center

Redmond, WA · ~82 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Living Well Health Center runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees workplace, earning a grade C.

Living Well Health Center: 4.4 TCR = 117% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Living Well Health Center safety composite

Living Well Health Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Living Well Health Center: 0.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Living Well Health Center's TCR rose 5.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Redmond, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 117% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/17
  • PHOTO Meadville Medical Ce…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meadville Medical Center- Vernon Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Living Well Health Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Living Well Health Center averages 4.4 TCR (117% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Living Well Health Center TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2023=7 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Living Well Health Center falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 17 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in Washington.

Living Well Health Center (82 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Living Well Health Center
Living Well Health Center (82 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Living Well Health Center has more employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 0.0 3 0 0
2023 7.0 3.5 4 0 0
2021 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2020 5.8 1.9 2 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · WA · Redmond

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meadville Medical Center- Vernon Place 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shasta Community Health Center 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VT2 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Community Healthcare Immediate Care Center at Schaumburg 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zillah 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smart Energy Today, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE D83 Seattle ELTEC 8315 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Earthwork, LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR 062 - Hanford Ca 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 429 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 745 Dwt62 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Matalco Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Feeco International Inc 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marc Glassman Inc 75WY 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marc Glassman Inc 69AV 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Le Meridien Chicago Oakbrook Center 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.