Community health centers and clinics, outpatient · California

Shasta Community Health Center

Redding, CA · ~468 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shasta Community Health Center runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Community health centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade C.

Shasta Community Health Center: 4.4 TCR = 116% of Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shasta Community Health Center safety composite

Shasta Community Health Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shasta Community Health Center: 3.3 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2024

Shasta Community Health Center's TCR rose 1.7 from 3.3 in 2019 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 116% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #55/132
  • PHOTO Meadville Medical Ce…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~468 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meadville Medical Center- Vernon Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Shasta Community Health Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shasta Community Health Center averages 4.4 TCR (116% of the Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shasta Community Health Center TCR series: 2019=3.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Shasta Community Health Center falls in its industry

599 Community health centers and c establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 132 Community health centers and c employers in California.

Shasta Community Health Center (468 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Shasta Community Health Center
Shasta Community Health Center (468 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Shasta Community Health Center has more employees than the Community health centers and clinics, ou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 2.4 20 1 0
2022 2.6 0.2 8 4 0
2021 3.9 2.7 11 6 0
2020 7.3 2.4 15 12 0
2019 3.3 0.6 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · CA · Redding

599 Community health centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meadville Medical Center- Vernon Place 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Living Well Health Center 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CKY Adult Services Downtown 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VT2 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Point Sal Packing 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE PALMETTO CONSTRUCTION 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE RQ Construction 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prime Now LLC - ULA6 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Monroe 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR IA Construction Management Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Redeemer Health and Rehab 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harbor Point Mineral Products 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omni Fort Worth Hotel 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Office 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lashr - Shreveport 468 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.