Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · California

L&M Logistics Group, Inc

Lancaster, CA · ~90 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L&M Logistics Group, Inc runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade C.

L&M Logistics Group, Inc: 4.1 TCR = 91% of Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L&M Logistics Group, Inc safety composite

L&M Logistics Group, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 5.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

L&M Logistics Group, Inc: 3.2 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2024

L&M Logistics Group, Inc's TCR rose 3.9 from 3.2 in 2022 to 7.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Lancaster, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #23/168
  • PHOTO Rapido LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rapido LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

L&M Logistics Group, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L&M Logistics Group, Inc averages 4.1 TCR (91% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L&M Logistics Group, Inc TCR series: 2022=3.2 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 4.5

Where L&M Logistics Group, Inc falls in its industry

1,452 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 168 Local letter and parcel delive employers in California.

L&M Logistics Group, Inc (90 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate L&M Logistics Group, Inc
L&M Logistics Group, Inc (90 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

L&M Logistics Group, Inc has more employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 5.7 5 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · CA · Lancaster

1,452 Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rapido LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Platinum Logistics Service, LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DMF5 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lexington Logistics of Ohio, LLC - Richfield 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Davis West Research Station 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland America Flowers, LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hettinga - California 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & R Contracting 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR 192 - Rockford IL 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hastings 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR T.A.C. Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Standard Sheet Metal Works, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florida Asphalt Contractors 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1254 Utica Ny 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farber Corporation 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flicker 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.