Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · North Carolina

LMH Logistics LLC

Chapel Hill, NC · ~101 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LMH Logistics LLC runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade A.

LMH Logistics LLC: 2.2 TCR = 34% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LMH Logistics LLC safety composite

LMH Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2022→2024

LMH Logistics LLC injury rate improved

LMH Logistics LLC's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.1 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Chapel Hill, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 34% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #12/214
  • PHOTO Fleet: Stockton
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fleet: Stockton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

LMH Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LMH Logistics LLC averages 2.2 TCR (34% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LMH Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 6.5

Where LMH Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 214 Local letter and parcel delive employers in North Carolina.

LMH Logistics LLC (101 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate LMH Logistics LLC
LMH Logistics LLC (101 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

LMH Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2023 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Chapel Hill

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 104 employers in Chapel Hill, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fleet: Stockton 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR IBC ORD 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nokia Logistics LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY-05-Same Day-Dispatch-Op Support-Call Center 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greensboro Resource Center - PNG 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barringer Construction, LLC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Services 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carrier Commercial Services (Charlotte Northwoods) 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 21,973 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Health Care 11,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spec Personnel, LLC 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale chapel hill 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Stahls Special Projects 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sticker Mule South Carolina, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Acousti Engineering Pensacola 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana Box, LLC. Huntington 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marathon Petroleum Company Salt Lake City UT 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mastronardi Produce 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE 752-PL001 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.