General Warehousing and Storage · Wisconsin

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009

Eau Claire, WI · ~101 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009: 10.9 TCR = 187% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 safety composite

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009: 6.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 14.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2024

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009's TCR rose 3.3 from 6.0 in 2019 to 9.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Eau Claire, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.9 · 187% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #177/195
  • PHOTO 4097 - ONTARIO II CA…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4097 - ONTARIO II CA MDO (COSTCO LOGISTICS) MERCH DEL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 averages 10.9 TCR (187% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 TCR series: 2019=6 · 2020=11 · 2021=14.5 · 2022=10 · 2023=14.4 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #177 safest of 195 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Wisconsin.

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 (101 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ecdc Sortation as - 3009
Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 (101 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ecdc Sortation as - 3009 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 2.1 9 0 0
2023 14.4 3.9 11 0 0
2022 10.0 1.3 8 0 0
2021 14.5 3.3 13 0 0
2020 11.0 3.3 10 0 0
2019 6.0 2.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · WI · Eau Claire

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 271 employers in Eau Claire, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4097 - ONTARIO II CA MDO (COSTCO LOGISTICS) MERCH DEL 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Price Transfer Inc, Wilmington 2-3 Warehouse 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4173 - AURORA CO MDO (COSTCO LOGISTICS) MERCH DEL 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - AVP8 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Family Farms 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. G. Van Holten & Son, Inc. 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&G Foods 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE HENKEL US OPERATIONS CORP 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precision Pipeline, LLC 3,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple) 3,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR WWD Sacred Heart Hospital 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR STORE DIVISION ADMIN - 3019 900 FTE
NAT-TCR Jersey Shore Steel 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Masaba Inc. 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Manhattan Beach 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ACLP Linden Estate 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Falls Mn - 3507 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marathon Petroleum Company Salt Lake City UT 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Citrus Place 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE LMH Logistics LLC 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.