Employer · New Jersey

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189)

Camden, NJ · ~259 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189): 0.2 TCR = 6% of industry BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) held a steady TCR band

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Camden, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO Raytheon_Aurora_CO
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raytheon_Aurora_CO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) falls in its industry

388 industry establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 industry employers in New Jersey.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) (259 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) (259 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden Campus (5189) has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.5 0.4 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · NJ · Camden

388 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 93 employers in Camden, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Aurora_CO 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3Harris Technologies INC Rodes Campus 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Systems : Grand Rapids, MI 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell International Inc 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shore Point Distributing Co., Inc. 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE #607 Freehold Shoprite 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5111 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Synergetics, Inc. (Central) 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper University Hospital 10,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 Cooper Plaza 6,439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center 2,283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Inc 1,906 FTE
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Bethesda HQ (1000) 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR IL018 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Burnham Industrial Contractors, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE XHG 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Distribution 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Savannah 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Samaritan Summit Village 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.