Employer · Texas

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551)

Lufkin, TX · ~376 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551): 0.1 TCR = 2% of industry BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) held a steady TCR band

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Lufkin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_W…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~376 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) falls in its industry

82 industry establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 industry employers in Texas.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) (376 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) (376 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · TX · Lufkin

82 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 109 employers in Lufkin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation HOUSTON-2100 SPACE PARK DRIVE (3537) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tewksbury Innovation_MA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex 376 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaneka North America LLC 376 FTE
STATE-SIZE 546 376 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2993 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilgrim's 1,314 FTE
CITY-NEAR A Pineywoods Home Services 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Medical Center of East Tx-Lufkin 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-42150001-421501 807 FTE
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Crystal City Campus (1001) 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 5 Dakota Drive 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydrite Chemical Co. HQ - Brookfield WI 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Automotive Systems Deer Park, IL 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avera Queen of Peace Hospital 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 13 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elliott-Lewis Corporation 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flowserve Corporation - Kalamazoo Operations 376 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.