Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing · Arizona

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop

Tucson, AZ · ~349 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop safety composite

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop held a steady TCR band

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~349 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation HOUSTON-2100 SPACE PARK DRIVE (3537) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop TCR series: 2019=0.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop falls in its industry

82 Guided missile and space vehic establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Guided missile and space vehic employers in Arizona.

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop (349 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop (349 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop has fewer employees than the Guided missile and space vehicle manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · AZ · Tucson

82 Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation HOUSTON-2100 SPACE PARK DRIVE (3537) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tewksbury Innovation_MA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ULA-Denver 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arizona Office 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beatitudes Campus 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parks & Recreation 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frito Lay - Casa Grande 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR The People Concern - El Puente 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The People Concern - Lodge 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Philips NAM CCSC Alpharetta, GA 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LGA Services 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3495-11DA097 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollywood Casino Baton Rouge 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta 041 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bayamon 349 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.