Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing · Arizona

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr

Tucson, AZ · ~368 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr safety composite

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr held a steady TCR band

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~368 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr falls in its industry

82 Guided missile and space vehic establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Guided missile and space vehic employers in Arizona.

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr (368 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr (368 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr has fewer employees than the Guided missile and space vehicle manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · AZ · Tucson

82 Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation HOUSTON-2100 SPACE PARK DRIVE (3537) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tewksbury Innovation_MA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5031 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASSA ABLOY EMS Phoenix 367 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corning Optical Communications RF LLC 367 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1240 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Energy Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Goettle Company 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stockdale Country Club 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 3495-50CG100 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 240953-Brockton Ma P&Dc 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosenbauer South Dakota, LLC 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blount County Government-General 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint James-John W. Albrecht Medical Center 368 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.