Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Michigan

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering

Flint, MI · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering: 5.9 TCR = 179% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering safety composite

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.1

2018→2024

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering injury rate improved

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering's TCR fell 14.1 from 14.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=12.8 · 2023=14.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Flint, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 179% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #92/131
  • PHOTO Autodie
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Autodie (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Logistics Mgmt and Engineering averages 5.9 TCR (179% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering TCR series: 2018=14.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=12.8 · 2023=14.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Logistics Mgmt and Engineering falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 131 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Michigan.

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering (27 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Logistics Mgmt and Engineering
Logistics Mgmt and Engineering (27 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Logistics Mgmt and Engineering has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 14.6 7.3 2 0 0
2022 12.8 12.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 14.1 3.5 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Flint

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 260 employers in Flint, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Autodie 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PROGRESSIVE MACHINE DIE INC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paragon D&E 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adtech 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Badger Evergreen Nursery LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE K Drive Greenhouse Co 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (MO) 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luurtsema Sales Inc. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Flint Truck Assembly 5,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Assembly 3,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hurley Medical Center 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Flint 2,477 FTE
NAT-TCR Public Works 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Winter Moving and Storage, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rhoads Industries - B57 Non-Construction 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Beach Maintenance 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wine Valley Inn 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Sticker Dude, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCurdy Mechanical Corporation 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3470 LLC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.