Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care

Tyler, TX · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care: 9.1 TCR = 238% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care safety composite

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care: 3.2 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 127.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2022

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care's TCR rose 8.3 from 3.2 in 2016 to 11.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 127.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tyler, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 238% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #323/470
  • PHOTO Ridgeview Assisted L…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ridgeview Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care averages 9.1 TCR (238% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=127.4 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=16.1 · 2021=70.5 · 2022=11.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #323 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care (44 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care
Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care (44 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oak Hills Terrace Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.5 7.7 2 1 0
2021 70.5 59.2 7 18 0
2020 16.1 13.4 6 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 4 0 0
2018 9.8 9.8 4 0 0
2017 127.4 127.4 3 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Tyler

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 357 employers in Tyler, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ridgeview Assisted Living 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Oaks 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quail Park on Cypress 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI NorBella Champlin 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva - Lubbock Research 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy Corporation - Cresson 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Driver Directional, Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler - CTMF 380 3,897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Main Hospital 2,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Tyler,TX-USA 2,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity Clinic - CTMF 381 1,705 FTE
NAT-TCR 402851-Eug-River Road Sta 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 742 Apollo High School 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 411456-Clifton Heights Po 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 335630-Neptune Po 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lone Oak Assisted Living 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hackettstown, NJ 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Rehabilitation Center-Hampton 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDS-St. Louis MB 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.