Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Texas

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green

Austin, TX · ~244 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green: 0.5 TCR = 18% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green safety composite

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2024

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #16/286
  • PHOTO CHRIST BROS. ASPHALT…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~244 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHRIST BROS. ASPHALT, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lone Star Paving - Harold Green averages 0.5 TCR (18% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Lone Star Paving - Harold Green falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 286 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Texas.

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green (244 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lone Star Paving - Harold Green
Lone Star Paving - Harold Green (244 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Lone Star Paving - Harold Green has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · TX · Austin

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHRIST BROS. ASPHALT, INC. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodfellow Bros. LLC - Wen Corp. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barber Brothers Contracting Co 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administration 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amherst Construction, LLC 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harper Brothers Construction 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE DynaGrid 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Constitution Hall - Egle 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryker- Mobius 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brook and Whittle, Ltd (Discount Labels) - New Albany 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Westchester Medical Center EVS 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE XGS - Tunnel Hill 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Falls Area Hospital 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Grand Haven 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Wire Johnstown 244 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.