Continuing care retirement communities · Massachusetts

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing

Springfield, MA · ~146 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing: 7.9 TCR = 207% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing safety composite

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2023

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing injury rate improved

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=12.2 · 2020=19.5 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Springfield, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 207% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/80
  • PHOTO Anns Choice
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anns Choice (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing averages 7.9 TCR (207% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=12.2 · 2020=19.5 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 80 Continuing care retirement com employers in Massachusetts.

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing (146 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing (146 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.3 9.3 9 0 0
2020 19.5 19.5 7 12 0
2019 12.2 9.1 10 2 0
2018 4.2 3.2 4 0 0
2017 6.8 6.8 6 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MA · Springfield

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 215 employers in Springfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anns Choice 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dominion Maryville, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFICA SHERMAN LLC 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fischbach and Moore LLC 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Capes Fisheries Inc 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atrenne Computing Solutions 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE OSHA 2018 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMC - Baystate Medical Center 8,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMP - Baystate Medical Practices 1,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC d/b/a MGM Springfield 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMF - Baystate Medical Practices 1,746 FTE
NAT-TCR Four Wheel Campers, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Westin Arlington Gateway 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North America : Venice 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenbrier Yard 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Electrical Distributors (Pc3276) 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Azs51 - Us Inside Sales - Phoenix 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sealed Air Corporation - Lenoir 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE William Penn Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.