Flatbed trucking, long-distance · Tennessee

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN

Mount Pleasant, TN · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Flatbed trucking, long-distance workplace, earning a grade B.

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN: 2.3 TCR = 51% of Flatbed trucking, long-distance BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN safety composite

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2021→2024

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN injury rate improved

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN's TCR fell 1.1 from 5.1 in 2021 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Mount Pleasant, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 51% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #14/37
  • PHOTO Shelton Trucking Alt…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shelton Trucking Altha, FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN averages 2.3 TCR (51% of the Flatbed trucking, long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN TCR series: 2021=5.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4 · BLS 4.5

Where Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN falls in its industry

1,026 Flatbed trucking, long-distanc establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 37 Flatbed trucking, long-distanc employers in Tennessee.

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN
Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Loudon County Trucking Mt. Pleasant, TN has fewer employees than the Flatbed trucking, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · TN · Mount Pleasant

1,026 Flatbed trucking, long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 9 employers in Mount Pleasant, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shelton Trucking Altha, FL 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brent Higgins Trucking, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HTC Knoxville 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Logistics Group, Inc. #1182 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE B&B Sawmill, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Union City UCY1 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Corporate 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8018168 - Nashville Federal Courthouse 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR UST, dba Landmark Ceramics 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fuel Total Systems, TN 78 FTE
NAT-TCR Jo Ellen Smith Living Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark Art Museum 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Automated Packaging Systems - SPO 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stark Exterminators 6101 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Copper River Seafoods Naknek 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA - World Centric 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houstoun Road 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roy Rogers Eastgate 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.