General Warehousing and Storage · Kentucky

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol)

Louisville, KY · ~327 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol): 1.6 TCR = 27% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) safety composite

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) held a steady TCR band

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol)'s TCR held near 0.3 from 1.4 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Louisville, KY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #64/252
  • PHOTO Toyota Tsusho - Lafa…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~327 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toyota Tsusho - Lafayette (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) averages 1.6 TCR (27% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 252 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Kentucky.

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) (327 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol)
Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) (327 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 0.5 7 0 0
2017 1.6 1.1 6 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · KY · Louisville

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toyota Tsusho - Lafayette 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60520 - CAPSTONE SYSCO DES PLAINS 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEHC : El Paso TX, HCS 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-3722 REDLANDS AVE 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4609-301 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE PetVet Operating dba Hagyard Equine Medical Institute 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Audubon Metals LLC 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE Br-02 Winchester Spring 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR Mount Pleasant (Mimtp) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR K4 - Oxford Valley 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Legends - Scranton Railriders 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Johnson Electric - Vandalia 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelby Location 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Michigan Janitorial 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greensboro Terminal-DOT 327 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.