Transportation Motor Freight Transportation Trucking except Air · North Carolina

Greensboro Terminal-DOT

Greensboro, NC · ~327 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greensboro Terminal-DOT runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Transportation Motor Freight Transportation Trucking except Air workplace, earning a grade C.

Greensboro Terminal-DOT: 3.7 TCR = 82% of Transportation Motor Freight Transportation Trucking except Air BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greensboro Terminal-DOT safety composite

Greensboro Terminal-DOT scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greensboro Terminal-DOT held a steady TCR band

Greensboro Terminal-DOT's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.6 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #76/125
  • PHOTO TMC Transportation -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~327 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TMC Transportation - Joplin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greensboro Terminal-DOT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greensboro Terminal-DOT averages 3.7 TCR (82% of the Transportation Motor Freight Transportation Trucking except Air BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greensboro Terminal-DOT TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Greensboro Terminal-DOT falls in its industry

3,252 Transportation Motor Freight T establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 125 Transportation Motor Freight T employers in North Carolina.

Greensboro Terminal-DOT (327 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Greensboro Terminal-DOT
Greensboro Terminal-DOT (327 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Greensboro Terminal-DOT has more employees than the Transportation Motor Freight Transportat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.8 3.5 13 1 0
2017 3.6 3.4 11 2 0
2016 3.6 3.4 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NC · Greensboro

3,252 Transportation Motor Freight Transportation Trucking except Air employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TMC Transportation - Joplin 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR W.L.A., Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300000170856288 - NJ-Keasbey-Bulk Operating Center 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Express, LLC 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ITG-Richmond 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 2 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson Brothers Mutual Distributing - Raleigh 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1300 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Matthews Leasing, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Omni Visions Memphis Foster Care 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR # 1 Cochran of Monroeville 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HomeChoice Partners - 2510 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sims Recycling Solutions 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelby Location 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Electric - Vandalia 327 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.