Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing · Georgia

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company

Alpharetta, GA · ~144 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company safety composite

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2018

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company injury rate improved

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.3 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Alpharetta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #17/27
  • PHOTO The Seydel Companies
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~144 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Seydel Companies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company falls in its industry

485 Tint and dye preparations, hou establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 27 Tint and dye preparations, hou employers in Georgia.

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company (144 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company
Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company (144 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company has more employees than the Tint and dye preparations, household-typ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 1 0
2016 2.3 1.5 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · GA · Alpharetta

485 Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Seydel Companies 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cottage Grove Site 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sun Drilling Products Corp. Belle Chasse Office 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams, RDM 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE RoofClaim.com, LLC 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Americo Manufacturing Company 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fellfab Corporation 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bremen-Bowdon Investment Company 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR JFSNA at AKZO Nobel Morris 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisville Technolgy and Logistic Center (Kylol) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount Pleasant (Mimtp) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR K4 - Oxford Valley 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DeAngelo Brothers Hazleton 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texarkana (Artex) 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE HQS - Airport United Airlines Offices 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston (Txcav) 144 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.