Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New Jersey

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown

Burlington, NJ · ~97 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown runs at 457% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown: 17.4 TCR = 457% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown safety composite

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.8

2016→2019

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown injury rate improved

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown's TCR fell 20.8 from 27.7 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 27.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=27.7 · 2019=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Burlington, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.4 · 457% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #84/92
  • PHOTO Moravian Hall Square
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moravian Hall Square (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown averages 17.4 TCR (457% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown TCR series: 2016=27.7 · 2019=7 · BLS 3.8

Where Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 92 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown (97 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown
Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown (97 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.0 4.2 5 0 0
2016 27.7 10.4 12 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NJ · Burlington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 101 employers in Burlington, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moravian Hall Square 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 'The Blake at Charlottesville 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linda Manor Assisted Living Center 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nelson Gables 17.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE NJ Haworth 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donnelly Industries Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infrastructure Repair Service 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mile Square Roofing Co,. Inc. 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR COMPASSIONATE CARE HOSPICE GROUP LTD. 1,470 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 1,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY2 1,055 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY8 658 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Freight Lines, Inc. - Memphis 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Charles 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Black Bay Ventures VI, LLC (dba Palmer Foundry) 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodbury Healthcare Center 17.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Snell Farm Childrens Center (SFCC) 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moss MIA Office 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Hotel 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE McDermotts Transportation Inc. 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.