Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing · California

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead

Rosemead, CA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead safety composite

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2024

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead injury rate improved

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.9 in 2022 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Rosemead, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #6/16
  • PHOTO Frankfort Fey
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frankfort Fey (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead TCR series: 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead falls in its industry

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, den establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Adhesives (except asphalt, den employers in California.

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead (30 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead
M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead (30 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

M Argueso & Co dba Paramelt Rosemead has fewer employees than the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · CA · Rosemead

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 51 employers in Rosemead, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frankfort Fey 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Composite Material Division 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pecora Corporation Distribution Center 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASC - Indianapolis 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE BZNUR 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1780 San Juan Rd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oaks 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfields Turf, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 597 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 603 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 260 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 1,117 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 9032 - Dale City 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Solar Innovations, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Cabot Group 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Williams International, LLC (WL) 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Reddog Industries 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fagron Sterile Services East 2 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Crabtree 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Inn & Suites Winston-Salem Downtown 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.