Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing · Tennessee

M & M Woodworking inc

Kingsport, TN · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M & M Woodworking inc runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

M & M Woodworking inc: 7.8 TCR = 238% of Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M & M Woodworking inc safety composite

M & M Woodworking inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2016→2024

M & M Woodworking inc injury rate improved

M & M Woodworking inc's TCR fell 9.4 from 9.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 19.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2017=14.5 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=19.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Kingsport, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 238% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/38
  • PHOTO CHEP Pendergrass Ser…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHEP Pendergrass Service Center (USYX) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

M & M Woodworking inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M & M Woodworking inc averages 7.8 TCR (238% of the Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M & M Woodworking inc TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2017=14.5 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=19.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where M & M Woodworking inc falls in its industry

952 Pallet parts, wood, manufactur establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 38 Pallet parts, wood, manufactur employers in Tennessee.

M & M Woodworking inc (28 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate M & M Woodworking inc
M & M Woodworking inc (28 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

M & M Woodworking inc has fewer employees than the Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 19.1 19.1 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.3 5.1 2 0 0
2019 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2018 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2017 14.5 14.5 3 0 0
2016 9.4 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · TN · Kingsport

952 Pallet parts, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 152 employers in Kingsport, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHEP Pendergrass Service Center (USYX) 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AW2 Logistics, Inc. - Cudahy 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kane Logistics - Lima 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stearnswood Inc. 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE K&K Tobacco Farms LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tosh Pork Martin 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Livingston 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lashlee-Rich, Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Kingsport Site 7,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holston Valley Medical Center 1,733 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company Kinsport TN- BSL 1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - VA 1,073 FTE
NAT-TCR Direct Pack East 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FV St Johns Hospital 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelson Wood Shims 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Crossroads Care Center of Fond du Lac 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Delta Constructors Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Law Motor Freight, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Village 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 024 Teutopolis IL 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.