Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Minnesota

Mabank ISD

Minnetonka, MN · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mabank ISD runs at 404% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mabank ISD: 12.1 TCR = 404% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mabank ISD safety composite

Mabank ISD scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2022→2024

Mabank ISD injury rate improved

Mabank ISD's TCR fell 10.1 from 18.6 in 2022 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=18.6 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Minnetonka, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 404% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #98/111
  • PHOTO PIEDMONT AUGUSTA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PIEDMONT AUGUSTA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mabank ISD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mabank ISD averages 12.1 TCR (404% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mabank ISD TCR series: 2022=18.6 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 3.0

Where Mabank ISD falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 111 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Minnesota.

Mabank ISD (41 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mabank ISD
Mabank ISD (41 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mabank ISD has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 0.0 2 0 0
2023 9.4 4.7 2 0 0
2022 18.6 9.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · MN · Minnetonka

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 179 employers in Minnetonka, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PIEDMONT AUGUSTA 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 500598700 MOUNT ST. MARY S UNIVERSITY 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 400351100 ORANGE GROVE ISD 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours Memorial Regional Medical Center - FNS 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Farming 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feedmill TW Shop - SE 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobbs Brigade Energy Services 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wild Rice Electric Cooperative, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN008 1,873 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Marsh 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN006 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN006 MINNETONKA-9800 HEALTH CARE LN 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Kodiak 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brenner Recycling 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kulp's of Stratford 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - RNT9 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Iowa Children's Museum 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stephens Pipe & Steel LLC BALLENGER 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glacier Valley Elementary School 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black Hawk County Secondary Roads 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.