Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · North Carolina

MAC Panel Company

High Point, NC · ~95 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MAC Panel Company runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

MAC Panel Company: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MAC Panel Company safety composite

MAC Panel Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2021→2022

MAC Panel Company injury rate improved

MAC Panel Company's TCR fell 3.7 from 4.8 in 2021 to 1.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.8 · 2022=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO RF&M - Santa Rosa
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RF&M - Santa Rosa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

MAC Panel Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MAC Panel Company averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MAC Panel Company TCR series: 2021=4.8 · 2022=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where MAC Panel Company falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in North Carolina.

MAC Panel Company (95 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate MAC Panel Company
MAC Panel Company (95 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

MAC Panel Company has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · NC · High Point

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RF&M - Santa Rosa 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex West Bond 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astro Seal Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex Torrington 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Circle S Ranch NC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh North Transmission and Distribution Operations Center 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE MB Haynes Corporation (Office) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Gas Turbine Operations 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gemtech LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LifeBridge Suburban Physicians Group, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR John G Levin dba Lindyspring Systems 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #665 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Francis Home 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Prior Lake 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE S Thomas Construction, LLC 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.