Nursing homes · South Carolina

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill

Rock Hill, SC · ~107 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill: 13.4 TCR = 206% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill safety composite

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2018→2024

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill injury rate improved

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill's TCR fell 2.0 from 3.2 in 2018 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 33.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=31.0 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=33.6 · 2023=15.5 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Rock Hill, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 206% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #141/165
  • PHOTO Woodlands Place Reha…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill averages 13.4 TCR (206% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill TCR series: 2018=3.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=31 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=33.6 · 2023=15.5 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #141 safest of 165 Nursing homes employers in South Carolina.

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill (107 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill
Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill (107 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 15.5 15.5 6 7 0
2022 33.6 33.6 2 25 0
2021 5.7 5.7 5 0 0
2020 31.0 31.0 0 27 0
2019 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · Rock Hill

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 221 employers in Rock Hill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inglewood Healthcare Center 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Laurels of Mt Vernon 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanover Health and Rehabiliation Center 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc SI Group 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Turner Construction 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE WeylChem US, Inc 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Machine Co. Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-340 1,642 FTE
CITY-NEAR 340 PIEDMONT MEDICAL CENTER 1,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rock Hill Distribution Center RHDC 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Rock Hill 1,072 FTE
NAT-TCR 2802 Fre148 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Nebraska 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodholme Gardens 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsboro-Butler #040 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Coast Tomato Growers, Inc. 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buford Warehouse 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2753 Tadych's Marketplace Foods - Houghton, MI 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE 052 - Fairfax Va 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.