Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maryland

Woodholme Gardens

Pikesville, MD · ~51 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodholme Gardens runs at 352% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Woodholme Gardens: 13.4 TCR = 352% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodholme Gardens safety composite

Woodholme Gardens scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Woodholme Gardens: 2.9 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 25.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.3× in 2024

Woodholme Gardens's TCR rose 5.2 from 2.9 in 2019 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 25.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Pikesville, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 352% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #66/79
  • PHOTO BSL FAIRFIELD OPCO LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BSL FAIRFIELD OPCO LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Woodholme Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodholme Gardens averages 13.4 TCR (352% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodholme Gardens TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=18.7 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=25.9 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodholme Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 79 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Woodholme Gardens (51 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodholme Gardens
Woodholme Gardens (51 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Woodholme Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 4.0 4 0 0
2023 25.9 0.0 4 0 0
2022 11.1 7.4 3 3 0
2021 13.4 12.4 0 13 0
2020 18.7 14.1 8 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MD · Pikesville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 16 employers in Pikesville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BSL FAIRFIELD OPCO LLC 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Age Senior Living of El Paso, LLC-DBA SunRidge at Cielo Vista 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bristal Assisted Living at Garden City 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRAND VILLA ORMOND 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE White Marsh Training Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barkay, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monumental Paving & Excavating, Inc. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1541 - Pikesville 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Courtland LLC 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Oaks Communities LLC 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Oaks Partnership 133 FTE
NAT-TCR Magnolia Manor of Rock Hill 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Taftville 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Nebraska 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsboro-Butler #040 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Crane Norcross 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE College Street Health Care Center 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Harrisburg 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Tulsa 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.