Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living

Mount Pleasant, SC · ~107 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living: 5.4 TCR = 142% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living safety composite

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2018→2020

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living injury rate improved

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living's TCR fell 5.4 from 5.6 in 2018 to 0.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.6 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mount Pleasant, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 142% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #39/107
  • PHOTO Brookdale Bossier City
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Bossier City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living averages 5.4 TCR (142% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living TCR series: 2018=5.6 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living (107 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living
Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living (107 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sandpiper Independent and Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.2 0.2 4 0 0
2019 10.5 10.5 3 0 0
2018 5.6 5.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Mount Pleasant

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 55 employers in Mount Pleasant, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Bossier City 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canyon Winds Retirement LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALP AC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harborside at Melbourne 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc SI Group 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Turner Construction 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE WeylChem US, Inc 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Machine Co. Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town Hall 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSA-COOPER,LLC 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSA-ATLANTIC ,LLC 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4384 263 FTE
NAT-TCR Shea Medical Center Campus 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Worls Wide of Navada 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 118308-Miami Insp Svc Division 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Process Displays LLC - PDF 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Paper 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAF Flanders Atlanta 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agrace HospiceCare / Rock County 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE EEW Brimfield 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.