Hotels (except casino hotels) · Minnesota

Mankato Hilton Garden

Mankato, MN · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mankato Hilton Garden runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

Mankato Hilton Garden: 4.0 TCR = 134% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mankato Hilton Garden safety composite

Mankato Hilton Garden scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mankato Hilton Garden held a steady TCR band

Mankato Hilton Garden's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=15.5 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 134% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #73/155
  • PHOTO Six South Street Hotel
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Six South Street Hotel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mankato Hilton Garden in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mankato Hilton Garden averages 4.0 TCR (134% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mankato Hilton Garden TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=15.5 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Mankato Hilton Garden falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 155 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Minnesota.

Mankato Hilton Garden (31 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mankato Hilton Garden
Mankato Hilton Garden (31 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Mankato Hilton Garden has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2019 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2018 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2017 15.5 0.0 2 2 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MN · Mankato

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Six South Street Hotel 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HAMPTON INN COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hotel Lancaster 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Olympus Resorts LLC 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Island Dairy 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Protein Sources, LLP 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Gen Plant-UC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Plant 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Deadwood Lodge 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Energy, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne Healthcare 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Danny Satterfield Drywall Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Genesis Transportation Co., Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Painting & Sheeting Corp. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Odin Epc, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - MON 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.