Other Direct Selling Establishments · Minnesota

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv)

Maple Grove, MN · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Other Direct Selling Establishments workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv): 6.8 TCR = 201% of Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS 3.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) safety composite

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2017→2019

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) injury rate improved

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv)'s TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.4 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454390 · Maple Grove, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 201% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/16
  • PHOTO 2077-US DD NW PHOENI…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2077-US DD NW PHOENIX BRANCH (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) averages 6.8 TCR (201% of the Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) TCR series: 2017=6.4 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) falls in its industry

212 Other Direct Selling Establish establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 16 Other Direct Selling Establish employers in Minnesota.

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) (29 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv)
Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) (29 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Maple Grove Mn(Db)/East Mn (Dv) has fewer employees than the Other Direct Selling Establishments median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 14.1 10.6 4 0 0
2017 6.4 6.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454390 · MN · Maple Grove

212 Other Direct Selling Establishments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2077-US DD NW PHOENIX BRANCH 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2077-US DD NW LAS VEGAS BRANCH 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DENVER CO - MOUNTAIN REGION OFFICE 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICOLD LOGISTICS - TAUNTON 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Mesa Grande Senior Living dba The Citadel Assisted Living 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Denali North Star Inn (Shared Services) 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR STAHL/Scott Fetzer Company 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DIY Group Huntington 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sioux Falls, Sd West 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma City Ok - Cb Truck Parking 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Simplot Company-SGS Ballico 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Simplot Company-SGS Edison 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.