Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC

Maplewood, MN · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC: 8.6 TCR = 226% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC safety composite

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.5

2019→2021

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC injury rate improved

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC's TCR fell 19.5 from 22.4 in 2019 to 3.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 22.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=22.4 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Maplewood, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 226% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #151/240
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Redding
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Redding (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Hill Senior Living LLC averages 8.6 TCR (226% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC TCR series: 2019=22.4 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Maple Hill Senior Living LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #151 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC (57 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Hill Senior Living LLC
Maple Hill Senior Living LLC (57 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Maple Hill Senior Living LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2019 22.4 15.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Maplewood

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 122 employers in Maplewood, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Redding 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Health Companies McGregor 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parc at Sharon Amity 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Otay Ranch 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCC-Blaine 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shore Track Services 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aid Electric Corporation 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3M Center 15,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St. John's Hospital 2,053 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Johns Hospital 2,020 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Hospital 1,574 FTE
NAT-TCR Roman Stone Construction Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR IBCM 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR D & M Truss Company, Inc 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Promenade Health and Rehabilitation 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE #19 Toronto 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE ir Distributers D. B. A. The Metal Shop 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lile Relocation - Kent Branch 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harding's Friendly Market #421 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.