Ducks, slaughtering and dressing · Indiana

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters

Leesburg, IN · ~94 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Ducks, slaughtering and dressing workplace, earning a grade B.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Ducks, slaughtering and dressing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters safety composite

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2023

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters injury rate improved

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Leesburg, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/17
  • PHOTO Springdale Processing
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Springdale Processing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Ducks, slaughtering and dressing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=4 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters falls in its industry

509 Ducks, slaughtering and dressi establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 17 Ducks, slaughtering and dressi employers in Indiana.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters (94 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters
Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters (94 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters has fewer employees than the Ducks, slaughtering and dressing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 2.7 0.9 3 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2017 4.0 0.0 1 3 0
2016 1.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · IN · Leesburg

509 Ducks, slaughtering and dressing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 4 employers in Leesburg, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Springdale Processing 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sebastopol Processing 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farbest Foods, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Koch Foods of AL Debone 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE AGM-Indianapolis 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Don R. Fruchey, Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campbell's Snacks, Indianapolis 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cortacre Breaking Plant 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kosciusko Ambulance Service LLC 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lassus Store 40 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Higginbotham Automobiles of East Memphis 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stewart & Stevenson I-10 Branch 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #50 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lucedale Dirt Cheap 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tennessee Bun Company, LLC 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunters Woods Senior Living LLC 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE SKF North America Technical Center 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hogan Bus Service Inc 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.