Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Utah

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City

Brigham City, UT · ~71 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City: 3.9 TCR = 101% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City safety composite

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2020→2024

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City injury rate improved

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City's TCR fell 1.6 from 5.6 in 2020 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Brigham City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #9/34
  • PHOTO The Watermark at 303…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Watermark at 3030 Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Springs Management - Brigham City averages 3.9 TCR (101% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City TCR series: 2020=5.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.8

Where Maple Springs Management - Brigham City falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 34 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Utah.

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City (71 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Springs Management - Brigham City
Maple Springs Management - Brigham City (71 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Maple Springs Management - Brigham City has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2023 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · UT · Brigham City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 23 employers in Brigham City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Watermark at 3030 Park 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Manor Retirement Community 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raymore Senior Care, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincolnia Senior Residences 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00558 AMERICAN FORK SVC CTR 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Granger-Hunter Improvement District 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris & Hart, Inc. - Office & Shop 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Salt Lake City 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northrop Grumman/Propulsion Systems - Promontory 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Autoliv Brigham City 984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitaker Construction Co. 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Associated Brigham Contractors 555 FTE
NAT-TCR DC 91 - Bay City 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR KYDOC Kentucky State Penitentiary 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kotis Design - Fairfield 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SeeScan Inc 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Most Inc 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE John W. Egan Co., Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gebhardt USA 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.