Egg hatcheries, poultry · Georgia

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery

Lula, GA · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Egg hatcheries, poultry workplace, earning a grade B.

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery: 3.6 TCR = 79% of Egg hatcheries, poultry BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery safety composite

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery held a steady TCR band

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=16.0 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112340 · Lula, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/26
  • PHOTO Sanderson Farms Tyle…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery averages 3.6 TCR (79% of the Egg hatcheries, poultry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=16 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery falls in its industry

197 Egg hatcheries, poultry establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 26 Egg hatcheries, poultry employers in Georgia.

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery (36 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery
Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery (36 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery has fewer employees than the Egg hatcheries, poultry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2018 16.0 8.9 9 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112340 · GA · Lula

197 Egg hatcheries, poultry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 4 employers in Lula, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amick Farms, LLC MS Hatchery 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pilgrims Pride - Hatchery 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkmont GP Egg Depot 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlas Greenhouse Systems, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Stephen County hatchery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lavonia Hatchery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE TA Smith 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Americold Logistics, LLC: Lula 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR LULA 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3515-35150034 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Technology Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Metal Supply Missouri 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Harbor Health Services, Inc. HCHC-P 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stephen F Peters Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crossover @ Midtown 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDM, LLC dba Bruns Machine 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Kempton at Brightmore 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grafton Food Center, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.