Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Michigan

Technology Center

Auburn Hills, MI · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Technology Center runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Technology Center: 3.6 TCR = 66% of Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Technology Center safety composite

Technology Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2023

Technology Center injury rate improved

Technology Center's TCR fell 1.1 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 23.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=23.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/146
  • PHOTO Magnode A division o…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magnode A division of Shape Corp - State Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Technology Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Technology Center averages 3.6 TCR (66% of the Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Technology Center TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=23.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Technology Center falls in its industry

772 Gas tanks assembled, automotiv establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 146 Gas tanks assembled, automotiv employers in Michigan.

Technology Center (36 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Technology Center
Technology Center (36 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Technology Center has fewer employees than the Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 23.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · MI · Auburn Hills

772 Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magnode A division of Shape Corp - State Street 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fuel Total Systems, TN 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakley - Toledo 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boysen USA Gaffney 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE R & R ASPHALT INC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Water Energy Center 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Facilities 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Haven Office 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastern Metal Supply Missouri 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mar-Jac Poultry Farms, Lula Hatchery 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbert Electric Co. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Harbor Health Services, Inc. HCHC-P 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trego/Dugan Aviation Inc Cmh 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Coast Flooring & Services 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dart Trucking Company Inc Kenova 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Kempton at Brightmore 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.