Aircraft inspection, government · Arizona

Maricopa County - Transportation (640)

Phoenix, AZ · ~392 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maricopa County - Transportation (640) runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft inspection, government workplace, earning a grade C.

Maricopa County - Transportation (640): 2.8 TCR = 87% of Aircraft inspection, government BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maricopa County - Transportation (640) safety composite

Maricopa County - Transportation (640) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maricopa County - Transportation (640): 2.3 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2024

Maricopa County - Transportation (640)'s TCR rose 0.4 from 2.3 in 2019 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926120 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 87% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO KYTC District 9
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~392 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KYTC District 9 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Maricopa County - Transportation (640) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maricopa County - Transportation (640) averages 2.8 TCR (87% of the Aircraft inspection, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maricopa County - Transportation (640) TCR series: 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=4 · 2022=4 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Maricopa County - Transportation (640) falls in its industry

208 Aircraft inspection, governmen establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Aircraft inspection, governmen employers in Arizona.

Maricopa County - Transportation (640) (392 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maricopa County - Transportation (640)
Maricopa County - Transportation (640) (392 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Maricopa County - Transportation (640) has more employees than the Aircraft inspection, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.2 10 0 0
2023 2.2 1.9 8 0 0
2022 4.0 1.4 14 0 0
2021 4.0 2.0 13 1 2
2020 1.4 0.9 5 0 0
2019 2.3 1.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926120 · AZ · Phoenix

208 Aircraft inspection, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KYTC District 9 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR D9 Headquarters 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division of Equipment 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maryland Port Administration 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 4325 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2515 391 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1533 391 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5429 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR City of South Haven - City Hall 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mayfield Hauling 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Newman Technology, Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aspenwood Senior Living 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Micropulse, Inc. 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Hotel 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABC Plumbing, Sewer, Heating, Cooling & Electric 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE HUNTER ENGINEERING COMPANY INC Bridgeton HQ and Plant 392 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.