Port authorities and districts, nonoperating · Maryland

Maryland Port Administration

Baltimore, MD · ~187 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryland Port Administration runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Port authorities and districts, nonoperating workplace, earning a grade C.

Maryland Port Administration: 2.9 TCR = 91% of Port authorities and districts, nonoperating BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryland Port Administration safety composite

Maryland Port Administration scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maryland Port Administration: 1.3 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Maryland Port Administration's TCR rose 2.0 from 1.3 in 2022 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926120 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Dept. of Transporta…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (3) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Maryland Port Administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryland Port Administration averages 2.9 TCR (91% of the Port authorities and districts, nonoperating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryland Port Administration TCR series: 2022=1.3 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Maryland Port Administration falls in its industry

208 Port authorities and districts establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Port authorities and districts employers in Maryland.

Maryland Port Administration (187 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryland Port Administration
Maryland Port Administration (187 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Maryland Port Administration has more employees than the Port authorities and districts, nonopera median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.6 6 0 0
2023 4.1 3.5 7 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926120 · MD · Baltimore

208 Port authorities and districts, nonoperating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (3) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maricopa County - Transportation (640) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KYTC District 9 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR D9 Headquarters 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Singleton Electric Company, Inc. 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCM Services 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plastipak- Havre de Grace 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3Harris Technologies Inc-Millersville 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Criterion Energy, LLC. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Paschall Truck Lines, Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Triton Stone Group - San Antonio 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sommers Construction Company, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tipp City Oh - 3240 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crest Hill Il - 3218 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Ford Sterling Heights 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villani Landshapers 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.