Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing · Indiana

Micropulse, Inc.

Columbia City, IN · ~392 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Micropulse, Inc. runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Micropulse, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Micropulse, Inc. safety composite

Micropulse, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Micropulse, Inc.: 1.6 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.46× in 2024

Micropulse, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.8 from 1.6 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Columbia City, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #19/39
  • PHOTO Roechling Medical La…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 89 inj
  • SIZE ~392 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roechling Medical Lancaster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Micropulse, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Micropulse, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Micropulse, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=2 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Micropulse, Inc. falls in its industry

741 Instruments, mechanical micros establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 39 Instruments, mechanical micros employers in Indiana.

Micropulse, Inc. (392 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Micropulse, Inc.
Micropulse, Inc. (392 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Micropulse, Inc. has more employees than the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 1.1 15 3 0
2023 1.2 0.2 6 0 0
2022 2.8 1.9 12 1 0
2021 2.4 1.7 10 1 0
2020 2.9 1.0 12 2 0
2019 2.5 2.5 12 0 0
2018 3.2 1.1 11 0 0
2017 2.0 1.3 6 0 0
2016 1.6 0.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · IN · Columbia City

741 Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 67 employers in Columbia City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roechling Medical Lancaster 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GCX Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CR Bard Moncks Corner 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Locations 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Supply Chain : Terre Haute, IN 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCI - 039 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schneider Electric USA 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail 944 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics Structural & Rail Division 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Columbia City 529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Undersea Sensor Systems Inc 527 FTE
NAT-TCR Foam Craft Inc. Plant# 20 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aida-America Corp 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Broome Bituminous Products, Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Roberts Environmental Control Corp. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maricopa County - Transportation (640) 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Hotel 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABC Plumbing, Sewer, Heating, Cooling & Electric 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE HUNTER ENGINEERING COMPANY INC Bridgeton HQ and Plant 392 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.