Rheostats (i.e., dimmer switches), current carrying wiring device, manufacturing · Kansas

Martin Interconnect Services

Wichita, KS · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Martin Interconnect Services runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Rheostats (i.e., dimmer switches), current carrying wiring device, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Martin Interconnect Services: 1.0 TCR = 29% of Rheostats (i.e., dimmer switches), current carrying wiring device, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Martin Interconnect Services safety composite

Martin Interconnect Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2023

Martin Interconnect Services injury rate improved

Martin Interconnect Services's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335931 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P81
  • PHOTO Bender Electronics, …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bender Electronics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Martin Interconnect Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Martin Interconnect Services averages 1.0 TCR (29% of the Rheostats (i.e., dimmer switches), current carrying wiring device, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Martin Interconnect Services TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Martin Interconnect Services falls in its industry

152 Rheostats (i.e., dimmer switch establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Martin Interconnect Services (32 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Martin Interconnect Services
Martin Interconnect Services (32 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Martin Interconnect Services has fewer employees than the Rheostats (i.e., dimmer switches), curre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335931 · KS · Wichita

152 Rheostats (i.e., dimmer switches), current carrying wiring device, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bender Electronics, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR IS - MFG US - Selmer, TN - Busway 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ormond Beach - 12 Southland Road 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Selmer, TN - Busway 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heritage Beef LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP CELL 6 LOADOUT 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE SHARP BROS SEED CO 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pishny Restoration Services 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR Corteva Agriscience JVL1-JanesvilleWI 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Bluff - Tubes & Cores - C321 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Overland Contracting Inc - PJFTLAUDE2 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE G.C. Commercial Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wood Co Machinery 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kingsly Compression, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Distributing Company 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.