Cellular phone tower construction · South Carolina

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc.

Greer, SC · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cellular phone tower construction workplace, earning a grade A.

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 34% of Cellular phone tower construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. safety composite

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. held a steady TCR band

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Greer, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/16
  • PHOTO CCI Systems
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCI Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (34% of the Cellular phone tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Cellular phone tower construct establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 16 Cellular phone tower construct employers in South Carolina.

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate South Carolina Tel-Con Inc.
South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

South Carolina Tel-Con Inc. has fewer employees than the Cellular phone tower construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · SC · Greer

1,605 Cellular phone tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 204 employers in Greer, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCI Systems 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pike Telecom and Renewables Florida Statewide Operations 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hot Line Construction Corona 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overland Contracting Inc - PJFTLAUDE2 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SC Operations 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little River Electric Cooperative, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE GreenWood, Inc. - GE Gas Turbine 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Wastewater Treatment Plant 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC 11,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Partners of America 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC 959 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH GREER MEDICAL CAMPUS 853 FTE
NAT-TCR Corteva Agriscience JVL1-JanesvilleWI 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin Interconnect Services 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Bluff - Tubes & Cores - C321 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Overland Contracting Inc - PJFTLAUDE2 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fregalette Construction 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect Transportation of Florida, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Moulding of WV 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ihop 3464 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.