Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Michigan

Marwood Nursing & Rehab

Port Huron, MI · ~350 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marwood Nursing & Rehab runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Marwood Nursing & Rehab: 14.8 TCR = 228% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marwood Nursing & Rehab safety composite

Marwood Nursing & Rehab scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Marwood Nursing & Rehab: 5.3 → 24.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 24.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.62× in 2020

Marwood Nursing & Rehab's TCR rose 19.2 from 5.3 in 2018 to 24.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Port Huron, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 228% of ind

  • DART 24.0 DART
  • RANK #411/471
  • PHOTO Gold City Health and…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~350 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gold City Health and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Marwood Nursing & Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marwood Nursing & Rehab averages 14.8 TCR (228% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marwood Nursing & Rehab TCR series: 2018=5.3 · 2020=24.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Marwood Nursing & Rehab falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #411 safest of 471 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Michigan.

Marwood Nursing & Rehab (350 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Marwood Nursing & Rehab
Marwood Nursing & Rehab (350 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Marwood Nursing & Rehab has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 24.4 24.0 13 43 0
2018 5.3 4.5 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Port Huron

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 87 employers in Port Huron, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gold City Health and Rehab 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hannah Duston 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennebunk Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCA HealthCare Management, LLC 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oscar W. Larson Company (Corporate) 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Livonia 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2559 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE SODEXO AT LANSING SD FACILITIES 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLAREN PORT HURON 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Port Huron Hospital 1,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of St. Clair 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Huron Medical Center 688 FTE
NAT-TCR Fisher Auto Parts - BRASE 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fountains at Granite City 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pressure Treating Facility 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hormel Foods Corporation 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alatrade-Boaz 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reinke Manufacturing Company, Inc. Deshler Location 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Center for Missing & Exploited Children - Hq 350 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.