Homes for the elderly with nursing care · New York

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home

New York, NY · ~527 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home: 3.2 TCR = 49% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home safety composite

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home: 3.6 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2023

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home's TCR rose 0.7 from 3.6 in 2018 to 4.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.2 · 49% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #140/616
  • PHOTO Rushville Nursing & …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~527 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rushville Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home averages 3.2 TCR (49% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=5 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #140 safest of 616 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in New York.

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home (527 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home
Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home (527 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 4.3 8 3 0
2022 1.2 0.9 4 0 0
2020 5.0 3.8 15 1 0
2019 1.6 1.4 5 1 0
2018 3.6 3.1 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · New York

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rushville Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHOREVIEW NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cypress Glen Retirement Community 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedford Care Center Monroe Hall, LLC 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Siemens Energy 527 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adco Electric 528 FTE
STATE-SIZE LNK - 22 Arkay 526 FTE
STATE-SIZE TTM Technologies (Anaren) 526 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #2259 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Embassy Suites Dallas 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Peoria Marriott Pere Marquette 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Duval Cty #8 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) 527 FTE
NAT-SIZE Va. Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services 527 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-FL 527 FTE
NAT-SIZE Undersea Sensor Systems Inc 527 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.